Hey who are you kidding the great quest in todays world is to be a thief or a corporate manager....a quote recently put it into perspective ( for me anyway) in immoral time "the best lack all conviction, while the worst are full off passionate intensity". Thank the ethicial quirk of wikki!!!
If you want my opinion, I think it sucks and is unethical.
If there’s a problem, then you attempt to counsel the person. If there’s a persistent problem you document and again counsel. At that point it’s no surprise if you create a PIP or move for termination.
The person who’s maybe in the wrong role has a chance to change the behavior, so long as the counsel given is specific and objective as is the remedy.
OK, here's another business question for everyone.
Is it ethical to terminate an employee because of “performance” even though no one has discussed with the employee their perceived lack of performance? Even though that person’s manager has provided good reviews and the employee appears to be meeting the expectations laid out by the manager? The situation is that another “manager” in the organization perceives “problems” with this individual and wants to replace this person in the organization. The question raised a few days ago was about whether to notify this person they are on a PIP (performance improvement plan) or to simply terminate. No detail of the “problems” exists (to date) and no one has attempted to counsel the individual at risk.
